Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures Treated with Arthroplasty Are Associated with Lower Mortality but Greater Costs Compared with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation at 30 Days.

Distal femur fractures (DFFs) are common injuries with significant morbidity. Surgical options include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and/or intramedullary devices or a distal femur endoprosthesis (distal femur replacement [DFR]). A paucity of studies exist that compare the two modalities. The present study utilized a 1:2 propensity score match to compare 30-day outcomes of geriatric patients with DFFs who underwent an ORIF or DFR. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2008 to 2019 were utilized to identify all patients who sustained a DFF and underwent either ORIF or DFR. This yielded 3,197 patients who underwent an ORIF versus 121 patients who underwent a DFR. A final sample of 363 patients (242 patients with ORIF vs. 121 with DFR) was obtained after a 1:2 propensity score match. Costs were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database using multiple regression analysis and validated with a 7:3 train-test algorithm. Independent samples t-tests and chi-square analysis were conducted to assess cost and outcome differences, respectively. Patients who received a DFR had higher transfusion rates than ORIF (p = 0.021) and higher mean inpatient hospital costs (p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis for patients 80 years of age or older revealed higher 30-day unplanned readmission (0 vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (0 vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) rates for patients undergoing ORIF compared with DFR. The total number of DFR cases needed to prevent one ORIF-related 30-day mortality for DFR for patients 80 years of age was 6 (95% confidence interval: 3.02-19.9). The mean hospital costs associated with preventing one case of death within 30 days from operation by undergoing DFR compared with ORIF was $176,021.39. Our results demonstrate higher rates of transfusion and increased inpatient costs among the DFR cohort compared with ORIF. However, we demonstrate lower rates of mortality for patients 80 years and older who underwent DFR versus ORIF. Future studies randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the results of this study.

Economic impact of orthopaedic care for non-fatal gunshot wounds: analysis of a public health crisis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform an epidemiological evaluation and an economic analysis of 90-day costs associated with non-fatal gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the extremities, spine and pelvis requiring orthopaedic care in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective epidemiological review of the Medicare national patient record database was conducted from 2005 to 2014. Incidence, fracture location and costs associated where evaluated. Those patients identified through International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 revision codes and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Codes who sustained a fracture secondary to a GSW. Any type of surgical intervention including incision and drainage, open reduction with internal fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous fixation, etc. were identified to analyze, and evaluate costs of care as seen by charges and reimbursements to the payer. The 90-day period after initial fracture care was queried. RESULTS: A total of 9,765 patients required surgical orthopaedic care for GSWs. There was a total of 2,183 fractures due to GSW treated operatively in 2,201 patients. Of these, 22% were femur fractures, 18.3% were hand/wrist fractures and 16.7% were ankle/foot fractures. A majority of patients were male (83.3%) and under 65 years of age (56.3%). Total charges for GSW requiring orthopedic care were $513,334,743 during the 10-year study period. Total reimbursement for these patients were $124,723,068. Average charges per patient were highest for fracture management of the spine $431,021.33, followed by the pelvis $392,658.45 and later by tibia/fibula fractures $342,316.92. CONCLUSIONS: The 90-day direct charges and reimbursements of orthopedic care for non-fatal GSWs are of significant amounts per patient. While the number of fatal GSWs has received much attention, non-fatal GSWs have a large economic and societal impact that warrants further research and consideration by the public and policy makers.

A Matched Control Analysis on the Effects of Alcohol Use Disorder After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have found the negative impact of alcohol use disorder (AUD), most notably coagulation derangements. We sought to investigate the effects of AUD after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for (1) postoperative complications, (2) lengths of stay, and (3) costs of care. METHODS: This was a retrospective database analysis of Medicare patients with AUD undergoing primary TKA performed between 2005 and 2014. Patients with AUD were matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, and medical comorbidities. The query yielded 354,690 TKA patients: 59,126 with AUD and 295,564 without AUD. RESULTS: Patients with AUD had significantly greater odds ratio (OR) of medical complications, including venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 90 days (OR: 1.41, P < 0.0001) and at 1 year (OR: 1.51, P < 0.0001) and greater 2-year implant-related complications after primary TKA. Furthermore, patients with AUD had significantly longer lengths of stay (4 versus 3 days, P < 0.0001) and incurred a significantly higher episode of care costs ($15,569.76 versus $13,763.06, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: The present study demonstrated a significant association between AUD and the development of VTE. We hope this research will aid in risk stratification and tailoring of VTE chemoprophylaxis and postoperative management in this at-risk group after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Factors associated with non-home discharge after total knee arthroplasty: Potential for cost savings?

INTRODUCTION: Increasing demand for total knee arthroplasties (TKA) has been targeted by legislation to minimize costs and maximize outcomes. Home discharges reduce costs, and it is important to determine patient variables associated with this discharge disposition. We explored non-modifiable and modifiable factors associated with non-home discharges to determine what patient specific factors require attention. METHODS: This retrospective study included 171,903 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients between 2011 and 2016. Patient specific variables and discharge destinations included home, short-term nursing facilities (SNF), not home, and rehabilitation. Chi-squared analyses and analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Multinomial regression model was utilized to assess associations between discharge destination and patient specific variables. RESULTS: Every year increase above the mean age (66 years) was associated with a nine percent (p < .001) and six percent (p < .001) increased odds for discharge to SNF or rehabilitation, respectively, compared to home discharges. Every 10% increase in BMI from the mean was associated with a 10% increase in discharge to both SNF and rehabilitation (p < .001 for both). CONCLUSION: With increasing demands for TKAs and expenditures to Medicare, evaluating factors that impact patient discharge can help optimize costs and outcomes of TKA procedures. Arthroplasty surgeons can benefit by recognizing these correlations and exploring reductions to non-home discharges through pre-operative patient optimization. Future studies should evaluate the economic cost potential associated with optimizing routine home discharge in TKA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Changes in Total Knee Arthroplasty Utilization since the Implementation of ACA: An Analysis of Patient-Hospital Demographics, Costs, and Charges.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) formed the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Center which has implemented experimental reimbursement models targeted at high-demand procedures to improve care quality. However, the effect of health care reform on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures has not been explored. This study explores patient-hospital level demographics, inpatient costs, and charges related to TKA procedures between 2009 and 2015. The National Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify patients who received primary TKA between January 2009 and October 2015 (4,283,387 cases). Categorical, continuous, and ordinal data were analyzed using chi-square/Fisher's exact test, t-test/analysis of variance, or Kruskal-Wallis' test, respectively. There was an increase in proportion of TKA recipients belonging to minority groups and the lowest quartile of median income (p < 0.05). There was a 1.9% increase in recipients using Medicaid as a primary payor and volume shifts from urban nonteaching toward urban teaching hospitals. There was a reduction in mean length of stay and mean inpatient costs. There were increases in hospital charges, but reductions in rates of inpatient mortality, and other postoperative complications. TKA procedures remain the most common surgical procedure; therefore, our study assessed national trends to capture the effect of PPACA. We found an increasing proportion of TKA recipients belonging to minority and low-income groups, volume shifts to urban teaching hospitals, and lower costs of care. These findings may be useful in objectively critiquing the effects of PPACA on TKA-related care.

Pain Intensity: How Press Ganey Survey Domains Correlate in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Decreasing postoperative pain for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients has been an area of continued effort for healthcare providers. These efforts have been incentivized by legislative reform, which ties reimbursement for hospitals and providers to patient perception of care. Press Ganey (PG) surveys quantify patient satisfaction, and the "pain management" domain is thought to be the best metric for assessing pain intensity. Therefore, these responses are important, as they are used to guide further improvements in healthcare delivery. This study analyzes which PG survey domains are truly associated with pain intensity in the immediate postoperative period following TKA. We queried our PG database for all primary TKA patients between November 2012 and January 2015, yielding a total of 214 patients. Multivariate regression analysis was performed utilizing pain intensity as the dependent variable. Predictor variables included body mass index (BMI), Charlson's comorbidity index, opioid consumption, and PG survey domains. Patient ratings of "communication with doctors" (B = 58.147; p = 0.001), "responsiveness of hospital staff" (B = - 62.663; p = 0.041), "communication about medicines" (B= -45.037; p < 0.001), and "hospital environment" (B = 69.342; p = 0.017) were associated with patient pain intensity. We found survey domains, other than "pain management," were associated with pain intensity. Efforts to improve outcomes and satisfaction should focus on staff education and communication. The current method for measuring patient satisfaction and reimbursement should be critically assessed and redesigned to better reflect true patient experiences.

Intravenous Acetaminophen May Be Associated with Reduced Odds of 30-Day Readmission after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate 30-day readmission rates in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who either received intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) acetaminophen (APAP) perioperatively and (2) to extrapolate the potential annual cost savings on the national level. This was a review of 190,691 TKA recipients between the years 2012 and 2015 who received either IV (n = 56,475) or PO APAP (n = 134,216). All-cause readmissions that occurred between patient discharge and 30 days postdischarge were recorded. Continuous and categorical variables were evaluated using t-test and chi-square test, respectively. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the effect of IV APAP on 30-day readmission. We also performed a literature review on 30-day readmission rates and risk prediction tools for TKA and correlated these with our findings. In addition, we extrapolated potential cost savings on the national level. The readmission rate was 0.04% in the IV and 0.14% in the PO APAP cohort (69% decreased risk; odds ratio = 0.31; 95% confidence interval = 0.20-0.47; p < 0.001). The readmission rate in this patient population appears to be markedly lower, when compared with previous reports. This reduction in readmissions may potentially result in $160 million savings per year. The use of IV APAP in TKA patients resulted in lower readmission rates, which may be valuable in clinical decision making by surgeons and health care administrators looking to lower costs of care.

An Analysis of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service Payment in Maryland: Can a Global Budget Revenue Model Save Money in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Maryland is the only state utilizing the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) model to reduce costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the GBR payment model effectively reduced the following: (1) costs of inpatient hospital stays; (2) post-acute care costs; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); (4) readmission rates; and (5) discharge disposition in patients who underwent primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA). METHODS: We evaluated the Maryland Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service database for THAs and TKAs performed at 6 hospitals 1 year prior to (2012) and after the initiation of GBR (2015). We compared differences in costs for each inpatient care episode, post-acute care periods (total costs, acute rehabilitation, short-term nursing facility, home health, durable medical equipment), readmissions, LOS, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Hospitals had a significant reduction in mean inpatient care costs for THA and TKA (P < .0001). There was a significant reduction in total post-acute care costs following THA (P < .001). Home healthcare had a significant increase in cost following THA and TKA (P < .0001). There was a significant reduction in durable medical equipment costs for THA (P < .0001). There was a significant decrease in LOS for THA and TKA (P < .0001). There was a significant increase in patients discharged home (THA, P = .0262; TKA, P = .0058). CONCLUSION: The Maryland healthcare model may be associated with a reduction in inpatient and post-acute care costs. Furthermore, implementation of GBR may result in reductions in LOS and readmission rates.

Treatment of Closed Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children Aged 6 to 10.

BACKGROUND: Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains controversial, particularly in children between the ages of 6 and 10. In the current push toward cost containment, hospital type, and surgeon subspecialization have emerged as important factors influencing this treatment decision. Thus, in the present study, we use a nationwide pediatric inpatient database to compare the: (a) incidence; (b) demographic characteristics; (c) hospital costs; (d) length of stay; and (e) treatment method of pediatric closed femoral shaft fractures admitted to general versus children's hospitals. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for all patients aged 6 to 10 who sustained a closed femoral shaft fracture in 2009 or 2012, and patient records were stratified into children's hospitals and general hospitals. Primary outcome measures included method of treatment, total hospital costs, and length of stay. Student/Welch t testing and χ analysis were utilized to compare continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, between hospital types. RESULTS: The total incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures decreased between 2009 and 2012 (1919 to 1581 patients; P=0.020), as did the proportion of patients treated in children's hospitals (58.6% to 32.3%; P<0.001). In addition, patients treated at general hospitals were more likely to receive open reduction with internal fixation (45.3% vs. 41.1%) or external fixation (4.1% vs. 2.3%), and less likely to be managed with closed reduction with internal fixation (32.0% vs. 39.7%) than those treated at children's hospitals (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a decrease in the incidence of closed femoral shaft fractures in 6- to 10-year old patients from 2009 to 2012, as well as decreased definitive management in children's hospitals and increased selection of operative treatment. In addition, treatment in a nonchildren's hospital was associated with decreased total inpatient costs and decreased treatment with closed reduction with internal fixation in favor of open reduction with internal fixation. Future studies should seek to identify the specific surgical procedures performed and match patients more closely based specific fracture pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level II.

Cementless versus Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Usage, Costs, and Complications during the Inpatient Period.

Cemented fixation has been the gold standard in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, with younger and more active patients requiring TKA, cementless (press-fit) fixation has sparked renewed interest. Therefore, we investigated differences in (1) patient demographics, (2) inpatient costs, (3) short-term complications, and (4) discharge disposition between patients who underwent TKA with cemented and cementless fixation. The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for TKA patients with cement or cementless fixation between October 1 and December 31, 2015. Primary outcomes of interest included complications, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and inpatient costs. Student's t-test and chi-square analysis were used to assess continuous and categorical data, respectively. Multivariable analysis evaluated the effects of fixation type on the continuous and categorical dependent variables. Patients who received cementless fixation were more often younger (63.5 vs. 65.9 years), male (47.4 vs. 40.3%), Black (10.7 vs. 7.7%), from the Northeast census region (29.1 vs. 17.1%), and under private insurance (49.2 vs. 40.3%; p < 0.001 for all). Cementless fixation involved higher inpatient hospital costs (US$17,357 vs. US$16,888) and charges (US$67,366 vs. US$64,190; p < 0.001 for both), lower mean LOS (2.63 vs. 2.71 days; p < 0.001), and higher odds of being discharged to home (odds ratio = 1.99; p = 0.002). This study revisited the outcomes of TKA with cementless fixation and demonstrated higher inpatient charges and costs, shorter mean LOS, and higher odds of being discharged home. Future studies should investigate patient outcomes and complications past the inpatient period, evaluate long-term survivorship and failure rates, and implement a prospective study design.

Clostridium difficile infection in the USA: incidence and associated factors in revision total knee arthroplasty patients.

INTRODUCTION: Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed secondary to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These poor outcomes may be further complicated by postoperative infection requiring antibiotics. However, antibiotic overuse may suppress patients' bacterial flora, leading to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Therefore, we aimed to study the: (1) incidence; (2) costs; and (3) risk factors associated with CDI in revision TKA patients. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for individuals diagnosed with PJI who underwent revision TKA between 2009 and 2013 (n = 83,806). Patients who developed CDI during their inpatient stay were identified (n = 799). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between hospital- and patient-specific characteristics and the development of CDI. RESULTS: The incidence of CDI after revision TKA was 1.0%. These patients were older (mean age 69.05 vs. 65.52 years), had greater LOS (median 11 vs. 5 days) and greater costs ($30,612.93 vs. 18,873.75), and experienced higher in-hospital mortality (3.6 vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001 for all) compared to those without infection. Patients with CDI were more likely to be treated in urban, not-for-profit, medium/large hospitals in the Northeast or Midwest (p < 0.05 for all) and to have underlying depression (OR 4.267; p = 0.007) or fluid/electrolyte disorders (OR 3.48; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although CDI is rare following revision TKA, it can have detrimental consequences. We demonstrate that CDI is associated with longer LOS, higher costs, and greater in-hospital mortality. With increased legislative pressure to lower healthcare expenditures, it is crucial to identify means of preventing costly complications.

Global Budget Revenue on a Single Institution's Costs, Outcomes, and Patient Quality Metrics in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Maryland was granted a waiver to implement a Global Budget Revenue (GBR) reimbursement model. Statewide results for combined medical and surgical services have been reported for fiscal years 2015 and 2016. A paucity of studies exists exploring the change in care costs and outcomes for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients under GBR. This study aims to assess the effects of GBR on cost of care and resource utilization related to TKA at a single institution before and after GBR. METHODS: The Maryland Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was used to find Medicare patients who underwent TKA at a single institution before (2012-2013) and after (2014-2015) GBR. A total of 150 and 161 TKAs were performed in 2012 and 2015. Cost differences were compared for each inpatient care episode, postacute care period, and readmissions. We also evaluated differences in length of stay, discharge disposition, and complication rates. RESULTS: Mean inpatient cost was significantly lower in 2015 vs 2012 (P = .0014); however, analysis of postacute costs showed a nonsignificant increase in price between years (P = .1008). We demonstrated significant increase in home health (P < .0001) and significant decrease in acute rehabilitation (P = .0481). Durable medical equipment costs significantly decreased (P = .0087). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate lower mean inpatient costs since GBR initiation. We reveal increased mean postacute care costs, which may be due to increased acuity for patients needing postacute care. Our results show nonsignificant reductions in length of stay, complications, and increased rate of home discharge, suggesting GBR may be effective in orchestrating reduced costs for TKA at high-volume institutions.

Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: A National Database Analysis Between 2008 and 2015.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act expanded health coverage for low-earning individuals and families. With more Americans having access to care, the use of elective procedures, such as total hip arthroplasty (THA), was expected to increase. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate trends in THA before and after the initiation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act regarding race, age, body mass index, and sex between 2008 and 2015. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all individuals who had undergone primary THA between 2008 and 2015. This yielded a total of 104,209 patients. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patient-level data. A Cochran-Armitage test assessed trends in categorical data points over time. Analysis indicated an increased percentage of blacks or African Americans undergoing THA (7.8% vs 9.2%, P<.001), followed by Native Americans or Pacific Islanders (0.0% vs 0.4%, P<.001), American Indians or Alaskan Natives (0.3% vs 0.5%, P=.016), and Asians (1.4% vs 1.5%, P=.002). An increased percentage of patients 55 to 80 years old received THAs (68.6% vs 74.1%, P<.001). The percentage of patients with a body mass index of 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2, 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2, and 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m2 increased (32.9% vs 33.1%, 24.2% vs 25.6%, 12.6% vs 13.3%, respectively, P<.001 for all). These findings may provide insight on the changing patient characteristics for orthopedic surgeons performing THA. Furthermore, these findings may inform health policy makers interested in increasing access to procedures underutilized by specific patient populations and the creation of strategies to meet increased demand. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e534-e540.].

Global Budget Revenue on a Single Institution's Costs and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The state of Maryland was granted a waiver by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services to implement a Global Budget Revenue (GBR) reimbursement model. This study aims to compare (1) costs of inpatient hospital stays; (2) postacute care costs; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); and (4) discharge disposition who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty at a single Maryland-based orthopedic institution before and after the implementation of GBR. METHODS: The Maryland Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was queried to obtain all Medicare patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty at a single institution before and after the implementation of GBR. We compared the differences in costs for the following: inpatient care, the postacute care period, and readmissions. In addition, we evaluated differences in LOS, discharge disposition, and complication rates. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in inpatient costs ($26,575 vs $23,712), an increase in mean home health costs ($627 vs 1608), and a decrease in mean durable medical equipment costs ($604 vs $82) and LOS (2.92 days vs 2.33 days). There was an increase in discharge to home rates (72.3% vs 78.9%) and a decrease in discharge to acute rehabilitation (4.3% vs 1.8%) CONCLUSION: Under the GBR model, our institution experienced significant cost savings during the inpatient and postacute care episodes. Thus, GBR may serve as a viable solution to reducing costs to Medicare for high-volume arthroplasty institutions with a large Medicare population. Multicentered studies are needed to verify our results.

Are Allogeneic Transfusions Decreasing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients? National Inpatient Sample 2009-2013.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic transfusions are commonly used for substantial blood loss in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but have been associated with adverse effects and increased costs. The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed description of (1) trends of allogeneic blood transfusion; (2) risk factors and adverse events; and (3) discharge disposition, length-of-stay (LOS), and cost/charge analysis for primary TKA patients who received an allogeneic blood transfusion from 2009-2013. METHODS: A cohort of 3,217,056 primary TKA patients was identified from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2009-2013. Demographic, clinical, economic, and discharge data were analyzed for patients who received allogeneic blood products, and for those who did not receive any type of blood transfusion. Other parameters analyzed include risk factors, adverse events, discharge disposition, and costs/charges. RESULTS: There was a significant decline in use of allogeneic transfusion from 2009-2013 incidence (13.9%-7.3%; P < .001). All comorbidities examined were associated with significantly increased risk of receiving allogeneic transfusion with exception of patients with AIDS, metastatic cancer, and peptic ulcer disease. Allogeneic transfusion was associated with worse outcomes during hospitalization. Patients also had a greater likelihood of discharge to short-term care, greater LOS, and greater median costs/charges. Among TKA patients who received an allogeneic transfusion, costs varied based on hospital ownership and characteristics, primary-payer, region, and bed-size. CONCLUSION: Given the poor outcomes and higher costs associated with allogeneic transfusions, efforts must be undertaken to minimize this risky practice. With the projected increase in demand for TKAs, orthopedists must understand effective blood management strategies.

No Correlation Between Press Ganey Survey Responses and Outcomes in Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: In the era of the online orthopedic market, patients tend to equate publicly available online satisfaction surveys with what they presume their ultimate surgical outcome will be. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess whether there is a correlation between Press Ganey (PG) scores and (1) Hip Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Harris Hip Score; (2) Short Form-12 and Short Form-36 scores; (3) University of California Los Angeles and Visual Analog Scale scores assessed at a mean of 3 years (range, 1 to 6 years) after surgery. In addition, we assessed whether (4) these correlations persist in patients who were evaluated under 2 years and 3 or more years after surgery. METHODS: Six-hundred ninety-two patients from November 2009 to January 2015 were identified from our institutional PG database. One-hundred ninety (27%) responded to the survey. One-hundred forty-nine (78%) patients were given the total hip arthroplasty assessment tools at a minimum of 2-year follow-up, and 33 patients (17%) completed their survey before 2 years after surgery. We assessed whether overall hospital rating scores correlated with the above assessment tools. RESULTS: Pearson correlation analysis revealed no correlation between the PG survey score and the assessment tools. HHS had the highest correlation coefficient (r = .120; P = .316); however, this was not significant. After removing the patients who had their follow-up survey administered under 2 years after surgery (33 patients), there was still no statistically significant correlation between the above-mentioned outcome scores and PG overall hospital rating (P > .05). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant relationship was found between commonly used total hip arthroplasty assessment tools and the PG overall hospital rating. Based on these results, PG surveys may not be a suitable implementation of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid services. A set of measures that can be widely collected and reported by hospitals for patients to use in order to evaluate hip arthroplasty outcomes needs to be developed. These results are of paramount importance, indicating a necessary reevaluation of PG surveys as a major determinant for reimbursements rendered by orthopedists and their use by patients.

Decline in allogeneic blood transfusion usage in total hip arthroplasty patients: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013.

INTRODUCTION: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for end-stage arthritis, it is also associated with substantial blood loss that may require allogeneic blood transfusion. However, these transfusions may increase the risk of certain complications. The purpose of our study is to evaluate: (i) the incidence/trends of allogeneic blood transfusion; (ii) the associated risk factors and adverse events; and (iii) the discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and costs for these patients between 2009 and 2013. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify 1,542,366 primary THAs performed between 2009 and 2013. Patients were stratified based on demographics, economic data, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and whether or not allogeneic transfusion was received. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for transfusion and postoperative complications. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2013, allogeneic transfusions were used in 16.9% of primary THAs, with a declining annual incidence. Except for obesity, all comorbidities were associated with increased likelihood of receiving a transfusion. Allogeneic transfusion patients were more likely to experience surgical site infections or pulmonary complications (p<0.001 for all). These patients were more likely to be discharged to a short-term care facility (p<0.001). Additionally, they had a greater mean LOS (p<0.001) and higher median hospital costs and charges when compared to their non-transfused counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: While the observed decline in allogeneic transfusion usage is encouraging, further efforts should focus on preoperative patient optimisation. Given the projected increase in demand for primary THAs, orthopaedic surgeons must be familiar with safe and effective blood conservation protocols.

Risk Factors and Costs Associated With Clostridium difficile Colitis in Patients With Prosthetic Joint Infection Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With the increased demand for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and corresponding rise in revision procedures, it is imperative to understand the factors contributing to the development of Clostridium difficile colitis. We aimed to provide a detailed analysis of: (1) the incidence of; (2) the demographics, lengths of stay, and total costs for; and (3) the risk factors and mortality associated with the development of C. difficile colitis after revision THA. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for all individuals diagnosed with a periprosthetic joint infection and who underwent all-component revision THA between 2009 and 2013 (n = 40,876). Patients who developed C. difficile colitis during their inpatient hospital stay were identified. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between hospital- and patient-specific characteristics and the development of C. difficile colitis. RESULTS: The overall incidence of C. difficile colitis after revision THA was 1.7%. These patients were significantly older (74 vs 65 years), had greater lengths of hospital stay (19 vs 9 days), accumulated greater costs ($51,641 vs $28,282), and were more often treated in an urban hospital compared to their counterparts who did not develop C. difficile colitis (P < .001 for all). Patients with colitis also had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without (5.6% vs 1.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: While C. difficile colitis infection is an uncommon event following revision THA, it can have potentially devastating consequences. Our analysis demonstrates that this infection is associated with a longer hospital stay, higher costs, and greater in-hospital mortality.

Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Revision surgery for failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to pose a substantial burden for the United States healthcare system. The predominant etiology of TKA failure has changed over time and may vary between studies. This report aims to update the current literature on this topic by using a large national database. Specifically, we analyzed: (1) etiologies for revision TKA; (2) frequencies of revision TKA procedures; (3) various demographics including payer type and region; and (4) the length of stay (LOS) and total charges based on type of revision TKA procedure. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify all revision TKA procedures performed between 2009 and 2013. Clinical, economic, and demographic data were collected and analyzed for 337,597 procedures. Patients were stratified according to etiology of failure, age, sex, race, US census region, and primary payor class. The mean LOS and total charges were also calculated. RESULTS: Infection was the most common etiology for revision TKA (20.4%), closely followed by mechanical loosening (20.3%). The most common revision TKA procedure performed was all component revision (31.3%). Medicare was the primary payor for the greatest proportion of revisions (57.7%). The South census region performed the most revision TKAs (33.2%). The overall mean LOS was 4.5 days, with arthrotomy for removal of prosthesis without replacement procedures accounting for the longest stays (7.8 days). The mean total charge for revision TKAs was $75,028.07. CONCLUSION: Without appropriate measures in place, the burden of revision TKAs may become overwhelming and pose a strain on providers and institutions. Continued insight into the etiology and epidemiology of revision TKAs may be the principle step towards improving outcomes and mitigating the need for future revisions.

Effect of Bundled Payments and Health Care Reform as Alternative Payment Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Clinical Review.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to control rising healthcare costs, healthcare reforms have developed initiatives to evaluate the efficacy of alternative payment models (APMs) for Medicare reimbursements. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Innovation Center (CMMSIC) introduced the voluntary Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) model experiment as a means to curtail Medicare cost by allotting a fixed payment for an episode of care. The purpose of this review is to (1) summarize the preliminary clinical results of the BPCI and (2) discuss how it has led to other healthcare reforms and alternative payment models. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed and the CMMSIC to explore different APMs and clinical results after implementation. All studies that were not in English or unrelated to the topic were excluded. RESULTS: Preliminary results of bundled payment models have shown reduced costs in total joint arthroplasty largely by reducing hospital length of stay, decreasing readmission rates, as well as reducing the number of patients sent to in-patient rehabilitation facilities. In order to refine episode of care bundles, CMMSIC has also developed other initiatives such as the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) pathway and Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture (SHFFT). CONCLUSION: Despite the unknown future of the Affordable Care Act, BPCI, and CJR, preliminary results of alternative models have shown promise to reduce costs and improve quality of care. Moving into the future, surgeon control of the BPCI and CJR bundle should be investigated to further improve patient care and maximize financial compensation.